Goal: To use various
geoprocessing tools for vector analysis in ArcGIS to determine suitable habitat
for bears in the study area of Marquette County, Michigan.
Background: The
Michigan DNR would like to be able to see which areas within their management should
be studied for suitable bear habitats.
Methods:
Objective 1: Add bear
points and give them a spatial position
To first begin the process, I needed to attain all of the
data from our class folder, which contained the USGS and DNR information on the
bears locations and landcover. In order to use the X, Y coordinates that the
individual bears were identified with, a created a temporary ‘event theme’. To
use the coordinates in the map, I needed to ‘add data’, ‘add x y coordinates’,
set the coordinates to match the geodatabases’ coordinate system, and then
export the data to create a feature class of the bear location points.
Objective 2: Determine
the bear habitat
In order to figure out what kind of habitats bears live in,
I needed to perform a spatial join for the bear_locations and landcover feature
classes. This then enabled me to access the attribute table and determine what
the top three forest types are most popular for bears.
Objective 2b: Are
streams important to bear habitats?
Because bears are often seen near streams, I wanted to
determine how vital that body of water is for bear habitats. To do this, I used
a select by location; I used the bear_cover as the target layer and the streams
as the source layer. This enabled me to calculate all bear location points
within 500 meters of a stream. I found out that 72% of bears reside near streams,
therefore it is a very important habitat characteristic.
Objective 3: What are
the suitable areas of bear habitats based on research in Marquette County
Michigan?
To figure out which areas are suitable for bears, I used
ArcToolbox to create a buffer for the ‘streams’ feature class to 500 meters,
which created a layer. Following that, I used the intersect tool to highlight
the land polygons that intersected with the streams. The input used for this
tool was the buffer_streams and sut_land. In order to remove the internal
boundaries of the overlaying polygons, I used the dissolve tool and used the
streams_buffer_intersect as the input. This cleaned up the image to make it
appear cleaner.
Objective 4: Make a
recommendation for the Michigan DNR based on the area of land they manage
To only include the areas of the DNR management within
Marquette County, I used the ArcToolbox to clip the segments out. This was done
by using the study_area as the input and the dnr_mgmt as the clipped portion.
The next step was to intersect the dnr_study and
streams_buffer_intersect_dissolve to create the DNR suitable area.
Objective 5: Take
away bear habitat study possibilities up to 5 km away from urban land.
In this step it was critical to make a layer called
urban_land with the ‘Urban or Built Up Land’ within the major type field within
the landcover data. This allowed me to create a 5-kilometer buffer around the
urban areas. From this I conducted an erase on the landcover_buffer so all of
the previously suitable land within the 5 kilometers of urban land was erased. This
left me with the bear habitat 5 kilometers away from the urban landcover.
Objective 6: Report
results in a map and a blog post.
I first cleaned up the legend of the map by renaming the
feature classes in order to clarify the symbols for the viewers. The map
includes the location of the bears, streams, and the results from objective 3
and objective 5. I added a north arrow and a scale bar for orientation and size
purposes. In addition, to understand the location of Marquette County in
Michigan, I created a locator map highlighting the county within a map of
Michigan. In addition, I added the sources from which the data was collected.
Sources:
DNR management units: http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/spatialdatalibrary/metadata/wildlife_mgmt_units.htm
Streams from: http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/mgdl/framework/metadata/Marquette.html
No comments:
Post a Comment